Lenin’s Critics
Relevance: GS Paper I
The article critically examines the evolution of Marxist theory and its practical application, focusing on key figures like Engels and Lenin. It highlights the disparities between ideals and actual revolutionary outcomes, especially under Leninism and its aftermath.
Marxist Interpretations: Karl Marx (1818-83) and Friedrich Engels (1820-95) viewed the 1789 French Revolution as the downfall of feudalism and the rise of a bourgeois society, which they believed would eventually give way to socialism.
- Friedrich Engel’s unsureness:
- Engels' comment, "History has proved us and those who thought like us wrong", raised doubts about whether armed rebellion was a suitable mechanism for realising socialism due to the huge standing armies maintained by modern nation-states.
- It even paved the way for the revisionist debate within the SPD(Socialist Democratic Party), the largest and oldest socialist party in Europe.
- It stressed reforms while reiterating its commitment to revolutionary socialism.
- Eduard Bernstein’s Evolutionary Socialism (1899):
- Eduard Bernstein (1850-1932) was the first to recognise and articulate the discrepancies between Marxist theory and the actual social, economic, and political realities within late 19th-century capitalism.
- He conceded that Marx was a genius but stressed the need to assess the development and elaboration of Marxism critically.
- Evolutionary Socialism highlighted the improved living conditions of the working class, leading them to adopt economism and parliamentarianism over revolution due to voting rights.
Vladimir Lenin’s response:
- What is to be done?
-
- Vladimir Lenin (1850 – 1924) felt it was important to prove Marx’s prophecy right, fusing Marx's majoritarianism with Nikolai Chernyshevsky's (1828-89) elite revolutionism in “What is to be done?”
- Lenin proposed a highly disciplined and organised Vanguard Party of professional revolutionaries based on the principles of secrecy, centralisation, specialisation, and exclusivity to make the revolution on behalf of the working class.
- Later Russian Social Democratic Labour Party (RSDLP) split into Bolsheviks and Mensheviks, meaning majority and minority, respectively, in Russian.
- Both groups were committed to revolution, but the Mensheviks supported an open and majoritarian socialist revolution and wanted to prepare for it while Lenin was in a hurry.
- State and Revolution (1916):
- In the aftermath of the 1905 spontaneous revolution, Lenin shifted his emphasis from the vanguard party to the dictatorship of the proletariat, which Marx mentioned in passing.
- He claimed the 1917 Kerensky February revolution was a bourgeois democratic one and his own Bolshevik October revolution was a socialist one, justifying that he was following Marx’s theory of the two-stage revolution.
Criticism of Leninism: |
|
Stalinism and the Failure of Leninism:
- The brutal repression of the Kronstadt rebellion in 1921 attenuated centralising and repressive elements within the regime.
- Lenin attempted half-heartedly to liberalise the Soviet system with his new economic policy (NEP) in 1921, but the failure to liberalise politically eventually led to the rise of Stalinism.
- The Stalinism was a malignant form of Leninism.
- Lenin’s insurrectionist politics, conspiratorial tactics and strategy set aside the entire thrust of Marx’s concept of a majoritarian and democratic revolutionary transformation.
- The Leninist revolution, in reality, was a minority revolution. The establishment of a repressive and authoritarian state and the subjugation of civil society logically followed this failure.
- Under communism, any deviating thought was dubbed as counter-revolutionary and had dire consequences culminating in the show trials of 1938 that killed Bukharin, Rykov and Tomsky.
Conclusion:
For the collapse of communism, the originators themselves have to be blamed, as they never produced a blueprint for actualising true democracy and full freedom. A well-developed Marxist theory of the state based on equity, just reward, rule of law and freedom as an alternative to liberal democratic theory eluded all important Marxists, including Lenin.
Beyond Editorial: What is Marxism?
What are Marxism examples?
Why is Marxism important in modern world?
|
Prelims PYQ
Q. One common agreement between Gandhism and Marxism is (UPSC 2020)
(a) the final goal of a stateless society
(b) class struggle
(c) abolition of private property
(d) economic determinism
Q. Karl Marx explained the process of class struggle with the help of which one of the following theories? (UPSC 2011)
(a) Empirical liberalism
(b) Existentialism
(c) Darwin's theory of evolution
(d) Dialectical materialism